Friday, February 24, 2012

The 2012 84th Annual Academy Awards Predictions




Best Motion Picture of the Year
The ArtistJoe and ChrisO
Joe: I think The Artist is going to win most of the 10 categories that it was nominated for, including Best Picture.  The film has won the equivalent of this award in other award shows over the past couple months.  The casting, directing, black and white cinematography, etc. are all superb.  It’s a great throwback to the early days of “talkies” and a seemingly unoriginal story was done in a tremendously effective way.  The only real competition for this film is The Descendants. 
ChrisO: The Artist obviously. It’s a silent film that’s good. The academy eats that up, all the other directors threw up their hands in defeat when they heard how good this movie was.
DON’T BE SURPRISED BY: The Descendants

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role
Jean Dujardin for The ArtistJoe and ChrisO

Joe: I think Jean Dujardin is going to win this award, mainly because he proved to be incredibly capable of mastering the lost art of silent cinema.  He only speaks two words in the entire film, so his body and facial expressions had to help move the plot along.  He proved to be up to the challenge.
ChrisO: Again, a good silent film trumps all. Dujardin could have been pulled off the street for all anyone cares. This is his to lose.
DON’T BE SURPRISED BY: George Clooney for The Descendants

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role
Viola Davis for The Help - ChrisO

Joe: It has been 29 years since Meryl Streep, the greatest actress to work in Hollywood in the past three decades, has won an Oscar.  She has had a record 17 nominations, but has only won twice.  If she is going to end her losing streak, or if the Academy decides to stop taunting her, playing Margaret Thatcher would do the trick.  Just as with every role that she has tackled since the late 1970s she is brilliant in the Iron Lady.  Streep gets into costume, dons the appropriate accent and becomes immersed in the character.
ChrisO: Sorry Meryl, that spot on your awards shelf is going to get even dustier. It’s time another black woman won that trophy. This is a very unimpressive lineup and considering how highly rated The Help was in comparison to the other films. And how many less rape scenes it had than Dragon Tattoo. I’m all for Viola Davis on this one.
DON’T BE SURPRISED BY: Meryl Streep. Never be surprised by Meryl Streep, she is a great actress.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role:
Joe: Warrior was the film that caused me to love Nick Nolte.  He has been nominated twice before, but did not win.  He is brilliant in Warrior, and is easily the best part of an already incredibly entertaining and well made film.  He is perfect as the recovering alcoholic, who has been a questionable father to his two sons and must try to redeem himself.  However, Max von Sydow and Christopher Plummer are brilliant actors, so it could be anyones guess. 
ChrisO: This is also a really sad lineup. But Christopher Plummer playing a gay father can’t be passed up. Especially since he is probably the best aged actor out there. Everyone loves Plummer and no one else pops in this category.
DON’T BE SURPRISED BY: Max Von Sydow for Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role
Joe: I think Berenice Bejo will win this award, for basically the same reason as the lead actor.  She even takes things a step further, and does not utter a single word in the entire film.
ChrisO: If Viola doesn’t win it, the other black woman will. Jessica Chastain has my vote. But I really wouldn’t be surprised by Berenice Bejo at all.
BE SURPRISED BY: Melissa McCarthy for Bridesmaids. She won’t win but wouldn’t it be fantastic of the academy actually recognized a comedy?


Best Achievement in Directing
Michel Hazanavicius for The ArtistJoe and ChrisO
Joe’s Prediction: I’m not familiar with Payne’s other work, but Allen, Malick, and Scorsese are all brilliant film makers. With that being said I think The Artist will get this award, assuming a film dominates the Academy Awards this year.
ChrisO: 90% of the time the film that wins best director also wins best picture. So this is a really safe bet.
DON’T BE SURPRISED BY: Any of the other’s really. All solid directors.

Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen
The Artist : Michel HazanaviciusJoe and ChrisO
Joe: The Artist for this as well, even though Woody Allen is a wonderful writer and Bridesmaids was indeed hilariously funny.
ChrisO: This is a real hard one. Is it really good writing if there is no dialogue? Who knows, I vote for The Artist yet again.
DON’T BE SURPRISED BY: Midnight in Paris : Woody Allen

Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material Previously Produced or Published
Joe:  I never saw Moneyball or Hugo, was confused by Tinker Tailer Soldier Spy, and saw the other two films several months ago.  With that being said I will go with The Descendants, since it seems to be immensely popular with stuffy critics and normal movie goers alike, and the story was realistic and emotional, brought to life by George Clooney, et al. 
ChrisO: I’m going to have to go with The Descendants as well. The buzz coming off this film has made it a major contender, and the one most likely to knock out The Artist.
DON’T BE SURPRISED BY: Moneyball : Steven Zaillian, Aaron Sorkin, Stan Chervin

Best Achievement in Cinematography
Joe’s Prediction: The four films I saw from this list were visually stunning in every regard.  However, I’m going to War Horse on this one.  Janusz Kaminski is a genius cinematographer and every single film he shoots for people, primarily Steven Spielberg, look beautiful.  He even makes crappy movies at least look attractive.  The outdoor shots, lighting, composition, and everything else looks beautiful in War Horse, and is one of the main reasons why it kept my attention, despite being relatively long. 
ChrisO: All of these films are beautifully filmed but the one that takes it to a new level is Tree of Life. Terrence Malick has always had an eye for the surreal. Even if every one of his films is a confusing mash of images, they are the most beautiful images you’ve ever seen, somehow evoking emotions you never thought you had. His cinematographer has to be a very patient man.
DON’T BE SURPRISED BY: Any of the others except Dragon Tattoo.

Best Achievement in Editing
Joe: Didn’t see it, but I’m going to go with Hugo.  I hear it is incredible and it bound to win a couple awards out of its 11 nominations.  
ChrisO: I never get this one right. Kind of assumed Tree of Life would be in here but guess not. So I am going to have to go with Moneyball.

Best Achievement in Art Direction
Joe: I will go with War Horse for this as well.  It was indeed a joy to look at. 
ChrisO: Midnight in Paris should win something.


Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Score
Joe: John Williams is probably the greatest film composer currently living.  I suppose that is why he has two nominations this year.  He and his orchestra are simply unbelievable and it is hard to image Spielberg’s films without the emotion, drama, and intensity that come from a Williams score.  War Horse has got this for me as well.  Janusz Kaminski and John Williams were responsible for my favorite parts of the film. 
ChrisO: John William’s has two shots to win here. But I don’t think he will get it. The Artist is only a “silent” film because there is very little dialogue. Which means the rest is all music. But don’t be surprised if Williams wins.

Best Animated Feature Film
A Cat in Paris
Chico and Rita
Kung Fu Panda 2
Puss in Boots
Rango – ChrisO
ChrisO: With its very creative and quirky visual style, not to mention some very impressive voice acting, Rango is the only real contender in this category. Of course I haven’t seen three of them but Rango  has my vote.

These are all the categories that we care about. Or that we have enough knowledge to actually make an educated guess on. Because seriously sound mixing and editing? What is that? And obviously The Muppets is going to win best song. Sorry for no documentary, we haven’t seen that or any of the shorts otherwise we would at least hazard a guess.

Haywire

At the risk of being labeled a movie heretic, Haywire is everything  Drive should have been. Sleek, sexy, stylish and abounding in popcorn entertainment, Haywire is the epitome of graceful violence.

Mallory Kane (MMA fighter Gina Carano) is an ex blackops gun for hire.  Like most guns for hire Mallory works for a company that finds jobs, usually from governments that don't want to legally be involved. Mallory is the best at her company, and the people who hire her know that. Her employer, Kenneth (Ewn McGregor), is not a very good boss and is also not a very good person. For some reasons that still confuse me he hatches a plan to betray her. The man who tries to kill her underestimates just how badass Mallory really is. Now on the run Mallory has to find out why she was betrayed and figure out how to kill as many people as violently as possible.

When you cast a MMA cage fighter as your lead actress, you certainly aren't putting the story first and the action second. Some might say this would result in a bad film, marred by bad acting and poorly delivered dialogue. But director Steven Soderbergh has walked this tightrope perfectly, off balancing the amateur Carano with Ewan McGregor, Michael Fassbender, Channing Tatum, Michael Douglas and Antonia Banderas.

Acting is secondary. Dialogue is terse and to the point. And the action is intense. Remember the Bourne series of movies? There was always one fight scene that was so visceral and brutal it got on the line of almost uncomfortable for the audience. But they were a thrill to watch. There are at least 5 of these scenes in Haywire. Carano and her aforementioned co-actors engage in brutal martial arts, showcasing impressive choreography and an extreme penchant for pain. They destroy tables, trash hotel rooms, and kill each other savagely. The mood setting music turns off during these scenes so the audience can hear every punch, groan and breaking bone in perfect audio clarity. I was on the edge of my seat wincing with the rest of the crowd, unable to turn away.

Most movies make the mistake of letting their action hero lead talk to much. Thankfully Carano spends most of her time killing people. Haywire is a ton of fun loaded with great actors and even greater set pieces. This is a film you won't be mad you spent money on.

3 out of 4 stars

-Christopher O'Connell

Friday, February 17, 2012

The Vow

There are only two kinds of people when it comes to “The Vow”: those who are going to see it, (or already have seen it) and those who will only see it because their girlfriends really want to see it. And then there are those who are forced to go because their editors think they see too many “manly” movies.


“The Vow” is based off the true story of Kim and Krickett Carpenter. On November 24, 1993, Kim Carpenter was in a car accident that gave her permanent amnesia. “The Vow” follows the same formula, Paige (Rachel McAdams) and Leo (Channing Tatum) are a happily married couple on their way home on a snowy night when they get rear ended at a stop sign. Paige, who isn’t wearing her seatbelt, goes through the windshield. She wakes up in the hospital to find that the last four years of her life have been wiped away. She no longer remembers Leo, her falling out with her family or her budding career as an artist. Unfortunately, Paige does remember her previous fiancée and is at a current point in her memory where they were still dating.

Just because “The Vow” is quite obviously a Nicholas Spark’s style romance tale, it doesn’t mean that it has to be a bad film. But director Michael Sucsy cut it real close. There is one thing that saves “The Vow” from being truly horrible: Channing Tatum.

Normally Rachel McAdams would be carrying a film like this, considering Channing Tatum’s hardest role up to this point was “Dear John”. Usually Tatum is strictly there for eye candy, and he does spend a good amount of time with his shirt off, but his earnestness and care for Paige was real and heartfelt. Judging by the 50 grown women and little girls crying in the theater I would say this is an accurate statement.

If Tatum carries the film, then everyone else drags it down. At one point, Leo yells at a stubborn and annoying Paige, “I’m trying to help you!” If only you could Leo. If only you could. Instead of focusing on the doting husband trying to recover his life with his wife and best friend, the audience is treated to stupid backstories with ex-boyfriends and extremely messed up families. Above all, the film makes some extremely poor dialogue choices. McAdams seems to just be phoning it in; if Tatum decided to leave her no one would be able to blame him. Every other character is just as forgettable as Paige’s memory.

“The Vow” isn’t as good as the true story it’s based on. It’s heartwarming most times but something was missed. The dating scenes are very cute and well filmed but where is the love? Where is the ‘til death do us part? Only Tatum seemed to find that answer and thank god or else there would be some very disappointed moviegoers this Valentine’s Day.

1.5 out of 4 stars
 
-Christopher O'Connell

Friday, February 10, 2012

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy: A Quick Review

It wouldn't be Oscar season without a British drama. And boy do we have a drama that is extremely British.
Adapted from John le Carre's beloved novel, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy is essentially a reboot of the BBC miniseries of the same name. I haven't seen it but that's what I heard. Gary Oldman stars as George Smiley  an important man in the British Intelligence during the height of the Cold War. But when the head of the organization quits he takes Smiley with him. Smiley is unsure why he had to quit as well but he founds out when he is later commissioned to figure out who in the top levels of the agency is selling secrets to the Russians. They all have code names tinker, tailor, soldier and spy.

The film has two things going for it. It is extremely well shot. Beautiful composition, sound, and lighting all add to the general ambience of the film. At many points, when quite literally nothing was happening, I was on the edge of my seat because the suspense was killing me. The second thing it has going for it is very strong acting. Gary Oldman is wonderful, a well deserved oscar nomination there. Colin Firth, Tom Hardy, Mark Strong and many other actors that can be seen in every single British film this decade push their weight around like professionals.

But sadly, despite the great filming and suspense, there was no payoff. The climax was coming, it was all set to be really exciting and revealing and the director just kind of threw a wet blanket on everything, dousing the flame of my curiosity. It was exciting until it got really boring because I realized nothing was actually happening. And add on to that the confusion. At one point I thought I had it figured out. Well done movie, I said, that was quite a difficult plot that you ended wrapping up nicely in a way the audience can understand. But then the movie kept going for another twenty minutes and convinced me that I had in fact not understood a single thing that happened in the film. Understanding slipped away from me, never to be seen again. I should probably read a synopsis somewhere.

Anyways, well filmed and well acted but too far on the boring, confusing side to have any real impact.

2 and a half out of 4 stars

-Christopher O'Connell